Com’ on Now – You just can’t have it both ways!
This was probably the most boring Academy Awards program I have ever watched. And yes, I stayed tuned throughout the entire program and even recorded it on the DVR hoping for it to recover itself with some bombshell that I wouldn’t want to miss … but it didn’t! Aside from the occasional glance at the screen to see if anything interesting was happening, hoping for a glance at the ever-elusive Bansky, listening for the use of any of the words the late comedian George Carlin caused the Supreme Court & FCC to ban from television that cause heart burn for the censors with their fingers on the 5-sec delay – this was a total waste of four-plus hours. Yea, Melissa Leo dropped one f-bomb (that they almost caught); Charles Furguson ripped the federal authorities for not putting any Wallstreeters in jail for their role in the financial implosion; and Inside Job’s winning the best documentary award dismissing any chance of having Bansky reveal himself……. Good thing the weather was horrible (foggy, snowy, and raining cats & dogs) in KC.
I understand that this year’s program was geared to attract a new audience = young folks who would need a hipper pair of co-hosts to pull it off. Both Anne Hathaway and James Franco failed overwhelmingly and had to be buoyed by old heads the likes of Billy Chrystal, Kirk Douglas, and even a technology enhanced (hologram) back-to-life version of Bob Hope. Heck, even Oprah couldn’t help to salvage this show. And finally, the Academy voted “The King’s Speech” about a historic event in a foreign land as the 2011 best picture – certainly not indicative of a film that the majority of the genYounger demo would find entertaining. Yes, I’ve got proof (of sorts) … in a pre-Oscar night survey of 90 18-24 year old college students; the King’s Speech didn’t get even one vote for best picture.
Where’s the disconnect?
Could it be that you can’t have it both ways? The Academy of Motion Picture Arts and Sciences boost of close to 6,500 members (6,404) who, according to the Guardian, are majority male and average 57 years of age. Membership is by invitation only, requiring sponsorship by two existing members and the approval of a board of governors; but once in, you're in for life. How much more old school can you get. This is the kind of antiquated patronage system that kept (and still keeps) women and minorities out of country clubs, off golf courses, and outside of many other social clubs.
The Academy comprises 15 branches, actors have 1,205 members; producers (452 members); executives (437); publicists (368); and the remainder comprised of the various crafts. Most are boomers who grew up in the 70’s, are accomplished, knowledgeable, liberal, and considered hip for an over 50 set.
But the stark reality is that “50+ is not the new ‘18-34 year old’ demo” (except to 50 plus-ers)! The Academy (and so many others) too often try to reach this demo using a hackneyed view of what’s hip based on what they think GenMers want, like, buy, and think. I’d bet they didn’t focus group this with Generation M for fear of becoming the film version of the Grammy’s. The secret to success resonances within this segment and is driven by individuals who are most likely natives to this generation.
So in a roundabout way, the failure of this year’s program wasn’t the fault of Hathaway or Franco, the blame should be placed on those who choose them, those who choose the winners, and the culture of the Academy itself.
Fashion photographer David LaChapelle is known for staging photo shoots with lots of bright colors, outrageous costumes, and sexy, surreal images. The video for Rihanna's new single, "S&M," has all three — and it looked so familiar to LaChapelle that he's filed a million dollar lawsuit against the singer, her record label, the video's director and production company for copyright infringement.
When compared side-by-side, the video does bear striking similarities to the photos LaChapelle claims were plagiarized. In once scene, Rihanna lies semi-nude on a table, surrounded by reporters in clown wigs. The corresponding LaChapelle photo depicts a woman lying in a hospital bed, also half-naked and also surrounded by clowns in business attire.
In his complaint against Rihanna, LaChapelle alleges, "Defendants are wrongly implying to the public that plaintiff was involved in the creation of the Music Video or that plaintiff has endorsed, approved or otherwise consented to its creation."
The lines between copycat art, homage to a previous artist's work, and work that merely explores a similar idea can be hard to draw, but they're essential to the notion of an artist protecting their intellectual property. Particularly when intellectual property and recontextualization are at the heart of the art in question. Take video artist Christian Marclay for example. In 2007, he discovered that an advertisement for a new Apple product, the iPhone, used a concept similar to the one he explored in a widely seen piece he created in 1995 called "Telephones." In both videos, rapid cuts show Hollywood actors from different eras answering the phone.
As he told The New York Times in 2008 (attribution rules apply to journalism, too), Marclay's suspicions that Apple had copied his work were made even stronger by the fact that the company, he says, had earlier approached his gallery about using the piece in an advertisement.
According to the Times, Marclay decided not to file suit against the smartphone maker. Partly because of Apple's size and resources, but also because he himself had appropriated video from old films without the consent of their copyright holders.
LaChapelle's case against Rihanna might be complicated by the fact that music videos have always borrowed images: Madonna's video for "Material Girl" looked an awful lot like Marilyn Monroe singing "Diamonds Are A Girl's Best Friend. But according to Jason King, an NYU Professor and artistic director of the school's Clive Davis Department of Recorded Music, digital culture has made the boundaries between borrowing and theft hard to enforce.
"There's a kind of ubiquity of unsourced images out there," says King. In what he calls the "Flickr era," after the oft-pilfered image hosting website, artists can now "borrow images, in a kind of grab bag aesthetic, from anywhere they want."
King says this kind of cultural feedback is just the way pop stars operate. As he points out, Rihanna's 2007 single "Don't Stop the Music" borrowed heavily from Michael Jackson's "Wanna Be Starting Somethin'." Jackson's song was itself a quotation of one by the Cameroonian jazz artist Manu Dibango – who was in turn riffing on 1960s-era James Brown funk.
But King maintains that it's not enough just to imitate – any piece of borrowed art should improve on its source in some way. "There's a sort of unspoken idea in the making of popular culture," says King, "that if you're going to copy something, at least the copy should zig where the original zags."
That's a distinction LaChapelle himself should know well. As a 1998 profile of the photographer in Advertising Age's Creativitypointed out, when he made the jump to video from still photography, his "directorial debut was a parody of Whatever Happened to Baby Jane? For MTV's Raw, starring grotesque Madonna and Courtney Love impersonators." LaChapelle also directed a series of Sprite commercials that riff on Wrigley's famous Doublemint Twins.
It isn't the first time LaChapelle has complained about a musician taking inspiration from his work, either. In that sameAdvertising Age interview, he lashed out against Meredith Brooks, who called LaChapelle to tell him his photography had inspired her video for the song "B****":
"I was like, what the f***?! That's my picture! That's the David Duchovny picture from The Face in '95! It's like, you are a b****, why didn't you call me to direct it?
"He breaks into a song and dance based on 'B****,' then stops to fume again. 'There is this whole thing about plagiarism when it comes to the verbal,' he seethes. 'But with the visual everybody thinks that plagiarism doesn't exist. It exists!"
Whether Rihanna's video crosses the line from remix to plaigiarism remains open for debate. In the meantime, King says, LaChapelle may just be reminding the world that his pictures exist, and that he came up with them first.
“one tweet at a time”
The Twitterverse fasst nahezu alle Twitter Dienste in einem Universum zusammen. Dies ist nach Umlaufbahnen gegliedert:
Ring 1: Branding
Ring 2: Geographics
Ring 3: Interest Graph
Ring 4: Dashboard
Ring 5: Event Management
Ring 6: Live Streaming
Ring 7: Geo Location
Ring 8: Relationships
Ring 9: Marketing and Advertising
Ring 10: Rich Media Ring 11: Communication Management
Ring 12: Research and Analysis Ring 13: Stream Management
Ring 14: Mobile Applications Ring 15: Trends Ring 16: Social CRM
Ring 17: Influence and Resonance
Ring 18: Twitter Search
Ring 19: Causation